Optimizing your artificial pancreas: Omnipod 5

T1D insights you can use:

1

Artificial pancreases, or hybrid closed loop systems, can help improve blood glucose management and reduce some of the daily burden of managing type 1 diabetes.

2

In a study of 176,405 people using Omnipod 5, approximately 35% spent more than 70% of their time within the recommended blood glucose target range, between 3.9 and 10.0 mmol/L.

3

Spending more time within the target range was associated with certain settings and behaviors, including spending more time in Automatic mode, taking at least 3 boluses per day, and having a blood glucose target of 6.1 mmol/L.

4

Understanding how your system works and its various settings can help you get the most out of it, always in accordance with your needs and with the support of your healthcare team.

Artificial pancreas systems, or hybrid closed loop systems, are designed to take over some of the work involved in managing type 1 diabetes (T1D). They can automatically adjust part of the insulin delivery based on data received from a continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) sensor and a mathematical algorithm.

However, this does not mean that everything becomes automatic. It is still important to learn how to use your system, understand its various settings, and, depending on the situation, continue to make adjustments for meals, physical activity, or certain specific situations.

The various artificial pancreas systems available in Canada have different features and ways of functioning. Understanding what your system can do and how to use it can therefore help you get the most out of it.

In the BETTER registry, which collects information about the experiences of people living with T1D in Canada, nearly 90% of participants currently use a continuous glucose monitor. This technology makes it possible to track blood glucose levels throughout the day and night and to see how much time glucose levels spend within a certain range. This measure, called time in range, corresponds to the percentage of time spent between 3.9 and 10.0 mmol/L. It complements the information provided by glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c). HbA1c provides an indication of average blood glucose levels over the past few months, while time in range offers a more concrete picture of what’s happening from day to day.

What can help improve time in range with Omnipod 5?

A recent study looked at how 176,405 people living with T1D and using Omnipod 5 managed their blood glucose in real-world settings in the United States and Europe. The researchers analyzed their data over a three-month period to see which settings and ways of using the system were associated with better time in range.

In total, 34.8% of people spent more than 70% of their time within the target range. The researchers then compared those who met this goal with those who did not, to see what might set them apart, particularly in how they used Omnipod 5 and the settings they chose.

Which settings were associated with better results?

People who spent more time within the target range tended to:

  • spend at least 90% of the time in Automatic mode;
  • administer at least 3 boluses per day;
  • use a blood glucose target of 6.1 mmol/L;
  • use more intensive insulin-to-carbohydrate ratio and correction factor settings.

But what do these settings mean?

The insulin-to-carbohydrate ratio determines the amount of insulin needed to cover the carbohydrates in a meal. For example, with a ratio of 1:10, one unit of insulin covers approximately 10 g of carbohydrates.

The correction factor, also known as the insulin sensitivity factor, indicates how much a unit of insulin should lower blood glucose.

With Omnipod 5, these two settings play an important role in the amount of insulin delivered at meals and when blood glucose is high. Compared with some other hybrid closed loop systems, Omnipod 5 may require more intensive insulin-to-carbohydrate ratio and correction factor settings to allow the system to deliver more insulin in these situations.

The insulin-to-carbohydrate ratio and correction factor are both calculated using the total daily insulin dose (TDD). In this study, among people with better time in range, the insulin-to-carbohydrate ratio was calculated as 350 ÷ TDD, while the correction factor was calculated as 83 ÷ TDD.

These results do not mean that these settings are suitable for everyone or that people should try to replicate them. Insulin needs vary from person to person and can change over time. Any changes to settings should be discussed with the healthcare team.

Results with the settings associated with better outcomes: adults vs. young people

Adults were more likely than younger participants to meet the goal of spending more than 70% of their time within the target range. However, among those using the combination of settings and habits identified in the study, time in range was similar in adults and young people.

Among people using this combination of settings and habits, time in range was around 77% in adults and 78% in young people. Time spent below the target range, that is, in hypoglycemia, did not appear to increase significantly.

These results highlight the importance of understanding how a system works and having access to tailored support to work with the healthcare team to find the settings that are appropriate for each person’s situation.

The numbers don’t tell the whole story

Time in range is an important measure of blood glucose management, but it’s not the only thing that matters. Living with T1D involves much more than just blood glucose numbers. The time and energy spent managing diabetes, concerns about hypoglycemia, the burden of treatment, and psychological well-being are also part of the experience.

Data from the BETTER registry suggest that new artificial pancreas systems can improve blood glucose management without necessarily reducing the anxiety or distress associated with managing T1D.

The goal, therefore, is not simply to reach a number. It’s also about finding an approach that supports health and daily life, taking into account each person’s needs, preferences, and reality. Tailored support can help people better understand how their system works and, together with their healthcare team, determine the settings that are most appropriate for their individual situation.

And if you’re living with T1D or LADA in Canada, you can also contribute to research by participating in the BETTER registry.

Want to learn more about Omnipod 5 or other artificial pancreas systems?

Are you already using an artificial pancreas or considering starting one? Are you a healthcare professional who wants to better understand these technologies to support people living with T1D?

On Support, our free online platform, you’ll find accessible content on Omnipod 5 and other hybrid closed loop systems, as well as resources to support day-to-day T1D management.

Reference:

Sawyer A, Wilmot EG, Do D, Miller KM, Ly TT, Forlenza GP. Settings Associated with Optimal Glycemic Outcomes with the Omnipod® 5 Automated Insulin Delivery System: Evidence from Real-World Users with Type 1 Diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2026 Jun 24:15209156261456826. doi: 10.1177/15209156261456826. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 42338327.

Written by: Sarah Haag, RN, B.Sc. and Cassandra Locatelli, PhD

Reviewed by:

  • Maha Lebbar MD, MSc
  • Remi Rabasa-Lhoret, MD, PhD
  • Anna Theroux, Pamela Dawe, patient partners

Upcoming Event

Discover more from BETTER

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading